Did you have one of those kids in your class in highschool (or before) who got his hands on some naughty magazine and just had to share the wealth? It would seem that kid now works for American Apparel's marketing group. It would seem a woman was browsing an American Apparel store and found an adult magazine on display in one of the backpacks. The magazine in question is normally sold from behind the counter at these stores, to those old enough to purchase such things in the first place, but displaying it "in the open" to anyone looking for a backpack is a different story, don't you think?
I've commented on sexuality in advertising on Facebook, another site frequented by many minors but this is not sexuality -- we're talking real porn here. And while this also deals with a third party (unless American Apparel's owners happen to also own the rag in question), it seems to me that any store worker who thought for a few extra seconds about it should have come up with the correct response to this situation long before someone saw the magazine.
CBC's Jian Gomeshi interviewed the woman and I recommend you listen to the podcast there for that side of the story.
I headed over to American Apparel's website to see if they had anything to say on the issue. Not finding anything, I clicked on their gallery page to see how they portray themselves. While the general photography shared is interesting and very cultural in some cases, their modeling page is much more sexualized and I can't say I learned much about their clothing (except how little one needs to wear).
Do I understand why this situation with the magazine happened? Well it seems obvious to me that pornography is alluring and they were using it to add sex appeal by association to the products in the store. Can it be justified in any way as an advertising gimmick in a store without an "Adults only" sign at the entrance? I don't think so.


Stumble It!

